Google’s changing strategy for AI content: A comprehensive view

Challenges in Identifying Quality Content Amidst AI-Generated Spam

The rapid evolution of AI-generated content is presenting a challenge for search engines such as Google, making it harder to distinguish high-quality content from spam. Interestingly, though, it is being suggested that Google is making strides in its ability to algorithmically identify such low-quality AI content.

Prevalence of AI-Generated Spammy Content

Even without a background in SEO, one can readily observe that generative AI-based content has been increasingly populating Google search results over the last year. Google’s position on such content has shifted, from considering AI-generated content to be spam, to focusing more on the quality of the content rather than on the manner in which it’s produced.

The result of this changed stance is an influx of AI-created low-quality content cluttering the web, some of which has successfully infiltrated the company’s search results.

The Dilemma of Invisible Junk

The “visible web” includes just a fraction of web content that search engines choose to index and display in search results. In other words, Google indexes only about 4% of the documents it finds when crawling the web, implying it excludes most of the content deemed unworthy of visibility.

The Dichotomy of Content Quality

Despite Google’s claim of its proficiency in distinguishing quality content, many SEOs and experienced website managers express contrary views, citing instances where inferior content outperforms superior content in ranking. The major challenge faced by machine learning models in this aspect is discerning quality content from great content.

Google recognizes these limitations, admitting that they don’t fully understand documents but rather “fake” it. Yet, they are seen to rely on user interactions on Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs) to judge content quality.

Impact of Brands on Content Credibility

Google identifies that the “dialogue” between SERPs and users is the key to its interpretation of document quality. Brands, with their recall power, shed light on how Google ranks search results. Genuine user interaction is prevalent on high-quality pages, such as those belonging to popular brands.

Recognizing AI-Generated Spam

Google defines spam as “Text generated through automated processes without regard for quality or user experience.” This can be taken as AI-produced content without any human Quality Assessment (QA).

Assessment Patterns for AI-Generated Content

Observations and experiments suggest that Google operates in a multi-stage process, with an initial “sniff test” that qualifies AI-generated content for indexing. However, low-quality content is eventually recognised and de-ranked after further analysis.

The Role of User-Generated Content in Beating AI Spam

In response to the AI spam issue, Google’s recent updates, such as the Helpful Content Update (HCU), could serve as compensation strategies. The introduction of such updates seems to have boosted user-generated content sites like Reddit in search rankings significantly.

Google’s Long-Term Plan to Curb AI Spam

Google is reportedly shifting towards relying more on machine learning systems like BERT and MUM to improve the accuracy of initial content parsing. This could drastically reduce the time taken to identify and de-rank spam, contributing to better quality control over web content in the long term.

If you want to take help to get more engagement on Instagram or to optimize your Instagram profile, you can also consult Digital SunBird for all kinds of assistance at a reasonable price.